By BoLOBOSE payday loan

Anxiety, Sadness, and Horror at the End of the World: A review of TAKE SHELTER by James Kendrick

NOTE: Take Shelter will be screened at 8:00 p.m. TODAY in the McLennan Community College Lecture Hall. Here’s a review of the film by Dark Mirror co-chair James Kendrick, reprinted (with his permission) from his copious collection of reviews at QNetwork Entertainment Portal.

In Jeff Nichols’s Take Shelter, Michael Shannon gives the performance of the year as Curtis, a blue-collar Midwestern family man whose increasingly intense nightmares about an approaching storm begin to haunt his waking hours and compel him to construct and stock an elaborate storm shelter in the field behind his family’s home. Shannon, who was nominated for an Oscar for his performance as a psychologically imbalanced neighbor in Revolutionary Road (2009), has become known for his unhinged characters (see especially his lacerating portrayal as a schizophrenic in William Friedkin’s Bug), thus his casting here might seem a bit too obvious. I would argue, however, that the brilliance of Shannon’s performance is not in the inevitable sweaty, wild-eyed moment of mental breakdown, but rather in the way he conveys the character’s gnawing fear of that breakdown and the sadness that overwhelms him as he compulsively goes about work that he knows may very well be destroying him and his family.

Shannon’s performance is matched with equal intensity and nuance by writer/director Jeff Nichols’s filmmaking. Nichols, whose feature debut, Shotgun Stories (2007), also starred Shannon, displays a Roman Polanski-like understanding of the manner in which small, naturalistic details can add up to an overwhelming sense of anxiety and horror. (Not surprisingly, the film plays like a male twist on Rosemary’s Baby, and we keep waiting for the “This is no dream! This is really happening!” moment.) The film opens with one of Curtis’s dreams, where he is standing on his driveway looking out at an enormous, menacing sky that soon begins to spit out yellow, oily rain. The nightmarish mixture of the familiar and the unfamiliar immediately establishes the film’s sense of nature as an uncanny beast that is all around us and imminently capable of destroying us. The heartland setting, with its vast, open skies that often feel like a gaping mouth ready to swallow up the tiny characters, plays its own role, relentlessly intensifying the sense of our own insignificance in the face of genuine natural threat. If the world wanted to consume us, it could in a second.

“We come in expecting the standard-issue, wild-eyed routine, but instead get something that is more sad than unnerving: a man whose visions of the end of humankind may very well be nothing more than the self-fulfilling prophecy of his own personal destruction.”

Nichols moves the story forward with a deliberate rhythm that emphasizes the small details of the everyday working world and gradually shapes them into a clear portrait of what might be lost if Curtis gives in to his visions. We see him interacting with his wife, Samantha (Jessica Chastain), a mother of solid faith and patience who cares for their young daughter Hannah (Tova Stewart), who was born deaf and needs expensive surgery for cochlear implants. Curtis works as a crew chief for a sand-mining company and spends most of his day in a hard hat out in the field with Dewart (Shea Whigham), his co-worker and best friend who not-so-secretly envies Curtis’s seemingly normal, stable life. “You got good life,” Dewart tells him at one point, and we recognize that Curtis does have a good life — the proverbial American dream, in fact, if demonstrably modest in its contours and always in danger of being undermined by external forces.

What Dewart doesn’t know, of course, is that Curtis is haunted by dreams that some kind of storm is coming and that those dreams, which Curtis takes for visions of the future, are shaping his behavior. When Curtis asks Dewart to help him dig out his back field in order to extend his storm shelter, he finds it curious, but doesn’t press him on it, even though he realizes that Curtis is sinking a small fortune into a seemingly ridiculous venture and also breaking the law by “borrowing” the company’s back hoe. Although, unlike Dewart, we see inside Curtis’s mind in sharing his dreams, we are in many ways aligned with the characters around him, helplessly watching as he digs what appears to be his own proverbial grave in obsessively building his storm shelter, an activity that takes over his life emotionally and financially. (One of the film’s most impressive conceits is the manner in which Nichols melds Curtis’s possibly unhinged paranoia with real-life fears about financial ruin, the need for subsidized health care, and the manner in which tightly knit communities can be both a blessing and a curse.) Samantha, ever the understanding and flexible wife, does everything she can to accommodate her husband, but even she ultimately has her own breaking point, and we begin to wonder if this fool’s errand will end up costing Curtis everything.

And therein lies the film’s tragedy and its emotional resonance. With downcast eyes set in that sharply etched, Easter Island statue-like face, Shannon makes it painfully clear that Curtis is all too aware of the possible absurdity of his actions, yet he is powerless to stop himself. He is, like the other characters, fundamentally helpless in the face of his growing obsession, and we sense with absolute recognition the anguish and, more specifically, embarrassment he feels regarding his predicament. (One of the film’s most moving moments is his response to waking up in the morning and realizing that his nightmare has caused him to wet the bed.) In this regard, it is to his advantage, rather than disadvantage, that Shannon has already played so many deranged characters, because we come in expecting the standard-issue, wild-eyed routine, but instead get something that is more sad than unnerving: a man whose visions of the end of humankind may very well be nothing more than the self-fulfilling prophecy of his own personal destruction.

Share
Posted in Film Lineup, The Dark Mirror | Tagged as: , | Leave a comment

Food for the Apocalypse: Concessions at Dark Mirror 2012

Because we know you were wondering, the concessions for sale at the film festival tomorrow will include

  • Popcorn
  • Drinks
  • Candy
  • Sausage wraps

In other words, you can make a meal of it if you want to. Or you can bring in your own food and drink. Eat well while celebrating the destruction of humanity, society, the world, and reality itself with three apocalyptic horror movies plus a panel discussion about why we’re all hungry for The End.

Share
Posted in The Dark Mirror | Tagged as: | Leave a comment

Doomsday Film Festival!

If you plan to be in New York City on October 19-21 (this weekend), be advised that the fourth annual Doomsday Film Festival looks like brilliant fun:

DESERTED STREETS! BLOOD RED SKIES! TOTAL SOCIAL BREAKDOWN!

Turning End Times into Good Times by Exploring Our Collective Fascination with The Apocalypse in Film, Art and Culture

It’s that time again: time to celebrate the universe’s evasion of annihilation for another year and explore our collective fascination with our impending doom while we’re at it. Yes, The Doomsday Film Festival & Symposium returns to 92YTribeca on October 19 – 21 for its fourth year of apocalyptically minded film, art and culture.

DDFF 2012 special guests include filmmakers, eco-warriors, authors, roboticists, poets and our resident bartending chaplain, plus a special Friday Night Dinner focused on Nostradamus and the Prophecies of Doom with 92YTribeca’s Rabbi-in-Residence Dan Ain and historian Stéphane Gerson. This year’s DDFF gallery exhibit (which is free and on display from October 19 – December 21) features art that investigates the concept of prophecies that herald the End of Days.

As always, apocalyptic attire is encouraged at DDFF: think bath-salt zombies, ancient Mayan prophets, flesh-eating mutants, tin foil-hatted conspiracy theorists, reverse-mohawked dieselpunks, four horsemen, patient zero, Chicken Little, Quetzalcoatl.

Or if you can’t be there, but you will be in Central Texas, then be sure to join us on Saturday, Oct. 20 for a similarly themed weekend of apocalypse and horror at the third annual Dark Mirror film festival in Waco. Brimming with Lovecraftian horror (In the Mouth of Madness), zombie horror (28 Days Later), and free-form paranoid horror about a catastrophic End of Everything (Take Shelter), and featuring a panel discussion on apocalyptic horror cinema with Baylor film scholar Jim Kendrick, Baylor religion scholar J. Gordon Melton, San Antonio police officer and zombie/thriller novelist Joe McKinney, and horror author and scholar Matt Cardin, the festival will deliver a dose of bracing End Times insight just in time to give you a final two months of preparation before the December 21st expiration of the Mayan calendar.

As for what will happen after that, we advise rewatching the trailer above.

Share
Posted in Film Lineup, The Dark Mirror | Tagged as: , | Leave a comment

“The darkest corners of human nature”: A review of 28 DAYS LATER by James Kendrick

NOTE: 28 Days Later will be screened at 3:30 p.m. in the McLennan Community College Lecture Hall on Saturday, October 20. Here’s a review of the film by Dark Mirror co-chair James Kendrick, reprinted (with his permission) from his copious collection of reviews at QNetwork Entertainment Portal.

Shot entirely on digital video and vibrating with a low-budget intensity that enhances its stark intelligence and dark wit, Danny Boyle’s 28 Days Later is an uncanny mixture of straight-up zombie horror and postapocalyptic science fiction. In the last few years, Hollywood has been churning out numerous slick and forgettable horror movies, all of which make 28 Days Later seem that much more impressive. It cuts to the chase and goes straight for the jugular while not forgetting that the best horror movies resonate inside long after they’re over not just because of the visceral experience, but because of how they reflect that darkest corners of human nature and our insecurities about the world in which we live.

Writer Alex Garland, whose novel served as the source for Boyle’s last film, The Beach (2000), has stirred up a heady brew for his first screenplay, borrowing liberally from George A. Romero’s classic zombie flicks, but also making his story frighteningly topical by injecting it with chemical paranoia. The zombies in 28 Days Later aren’t the living dead, but rather infected victims whose blood boils with a chemically produced virus simply called “Rage.” Spawned by Cambridge scientists and unwittingly unleashed on the populace by a trio of animal-rights activists who free lab monkeys, “Rage” is highly contagious and takes a mere 20 seconds to turn an ordinary human being into a raving monster.

The title of the film comes from the amount of time it takes the virus to spread through Great Britain and render it a wasteland. Like the film’s protagonist, a young man named Jim (Cillian Murphy), we don’t see the virus spread through the population. Jim awakes in a hospital after a month of being in a coma following a traffic accident, and when he stumbles outside, he finds London completely deserted. Well, not completely — it isn’t long before he runs into the first of “the infected,” as they come to be called. Searching for other survivors, he eventually finds himself with an intense young woman named Selena (Naomie Harris), whose determination to survive is coming close to costing her her emotions, a distraught father named Frank (Brendan Gleeson), and his teenage daughter, Hannah (Megan Burns).

“28 Days Later sticks in your gut because of what it ultimately says about humanity. It is hard not to read it as a striking condemnation of humanity’s tendency to obliterate itself.”

The first half of the film follows Jim as he discovers what has happened and he and the others try to decide what to do. After picking up a recorded radio broadcast, they head out into the country in the hopes of meeting up with a platoon of soldiers who claim to offer protection and a possible cure for the virus. However, once there they find themselves trapped in a surreal world run by Major Henry West (Christopher Eccleston), an officer who has taken it upon himself to restart civilization in an abandoned manor. Like Romero’s zombie trilogy, 28 Days Later finds some of its most compelling material not in the horror of rampaging human monstrosities, but in the tension and pressure of a handful of survivors trying to make sense of the chaos and figure out how to reclaim their civility.

On a visual level, 28 Days Later is a marvel. The washed out, low-resolution digital video adds to, rather than detracts from, the film’s overall tone of desperation and despair. The editing is often abrupt and vicious, particularly when the infected are attacking. Unlike the zombies we have grown accustomed to on the big screen, the infected are quick, vicious, and determined. They run with frightening speed, emitting grotesquely guttural noises that sound like the dying screeches of a rabid mountain lion, and they attack with a ferocity that is truly frightening. Boyle rarely stoops to horror cliches, instead relying on the scariness of the film’s ideas. Its most gut-wrenching scene takes place in a dark tunnel, where the survivors are struggling to change a flat tire while hoards of infected ghouls charge toward them, rendered almost entirely as shadows on the tunnel wall. (One has to wonder if the scene was inspired by the well-known tunnel sequence in Stephen King’s The Stand).

Yet, for all its effective visual horror, 28 Days Later sticks in your gut because of what it ultimately says about humanity. The film opens with actual footage of human atrocities — beatings, riots, wars, etc. — which is being shown to a test monkey strapped to a table. Thus, it opens with real-life violence, and the memories of it reverberate throughout the film. As one character puts it, the world after the infection isn’t really all that different from the world before it because it is still composed of “people killing people.” We see a number of infected ghouls killed in ghastly ways, but the most disturbing death in the film is one uninfected character killing another by literally gouging his eyes out. The fact that we are not entirely sure whether or not he is infected at this point speaks volumes about how the filmmakers see human nature. Rage, whether unleashed by a virus or uncontrollable human emotion, ultimately leads to bloodshed, and even though 28 Days Later ends on what can be construed as a positive note, it is hard not to read it as a striking condemnation of humanity’s tendency to obliterate itself.

 

Share
Posted in Zombies | Tagged as: , | Leave a comment

Changing reality into a nightmare: “In the Mouth of Madness” (MOVIE TRAILER)

This year’s Dark Mirror film festival will take place on Saturday, October 28, and will kick off at 1 p.m. with a screening of director John Carpenter’s awesome cinematic exploration of Lovecraftian themes, In the Mouth of Madness. The screenplay — which is littered with Lovecraftian references (e.g., a character is named “Mrs. Pickman”; a horde of monstrous of gods are known as “the Old Ones”) — was penned by Michael de Luca, who happened to be the head of New Line Cinema when the film was released, and who was also involved in producing various other horror films of the era, including the two entries in the Nightmare on Elm Street series.

The trailer does a fine job of conveying not only the movie’s main themes but its tone. What if the world’s most popular horror writer drew his inspiration from a supernaturally monstrous force? And what if this ancient, otherworldly evil was using this man’s books to propagate itself by invading people’s minds and eventually changing reality into a nightmare?

 

Share
Posted in Film Lineup | Tagged as: , , | Leave a comment

Welcome to The Dark Mirror 2012: Horror and Apocalypse

Here we are again: the shadow-haunted month of October has finally rolled around, and The Dark Mirror, Waco’s horror film festival, reawakens after a year’s deathlike slumber beneath the silent earth. We’re happy to announce that this year’s festivities have coalesced on a single day, October 20, the better to pack in a bunch of cool proceedings for fans of thoughtful, reflective, and truly horrifying horror cinema. Click to enlarge the poster at right for a full view of what’s in store.

This year’s theme is Horror and Apocalypse. Last year, as you’ll recall, it was Horror and the Soul. The year before that it was Horror and Society. The turn toward an all-out focus on the apocalyptic for 2012 seems entirely warranted in light of the previous progression, especially since here in America we’re all living through a heady cultural moment when the life of the nation has been overtaken by an Armageddon-like sentiment of impending collapse and doom. Yes, this has something to do with the ongoing (but oddly muted, given the current late date) furor over the December 2012 Mayan Doomsday meme. But more broadly and seriously, our collective sense of an imminent End of Everything is tied to all of the grimness, violence, breakdown, corruption, and insanity we’re seeing on all fronts both at home and abroad: ongoing economic collapse, political disaster, cultural corruption, psychological breakdown, mass media mayhem, and more.

To explore this buzzing arena of doomishness, we’ve selected three particularly effective films depicting three very different and disturbing End of the World visions, and have also put together a panel of experts from the fields of religion scholarship, cinema scholarship, and horror writing to hash out what’s really going on in the convergence and confluence of horror and apocalyptic fears and sentiments here in the Last Days (of 2012, that is).

As always, the festival itself is free and open to the public, and students from Baylor University and McLennan Community College may earn credit in their classes for attending one or more of the films and/or the panel discussion. (If you’re a student at either of these institutions, you must check with your professors and/or instructors to verify whether and how they will be providing such credit.)

As always, there will be concessions for sale, or you can bring your own refreshments. Last year a surprisingly large contingent of the audience made the whole thing a dinner-and-a-movie event by bringing in hot food from nearby restaurants. The year before that, some enterprising students brought bread, cheese, and wine. You get the idea. This is an event where you can eat, watch, listen, and learn.

Speaking of watching, keep watching this space for information and announcements leading up to the day itself. We’ll see you on October 20!

Share
Posted in The Dark Mirror | Tagged as: , , | Leave a comment

Festival Report, Day Two

And now, coming to you from the “Better Late Than Never” department, here’s a report on Day Two of The Dark Mirror 2011:

The 3:00 p.m. screening of Invasion of the Body Snatchers 1978 drew a large and interested audience. Dark Mirror founder Matt Cardin prefaced the film with a talk in which he explained how the film updated the McCarthy-era fears of “aliens in our midst” embodied in the source novel and the original 1956 film in order to channel the mounting apocalyptic fears of a 1970s American populace besieged by a nasty recession, two separate energy crises, political scandal and meltdown (think: Watergate), societal disruption and disaffection (think: Vietnam), and more. The film elicited a rather intense response from the crowd.

He opened the 5:30 screening of Session 9 by sharing the history of the Danvers State Hospital in Danvers, Massachusetts — also known as the Danvers Lunatic Asylum and the Danvers State Insane Asylum — where the film was shot in its entirety. He explained that the film had actually been written specifically for the location, and described it as the single most disturbing film he had ever watched. As with the earlier screenings of Body Snatchers and The Mist, the audience was visibly and audibly gripped and moved by Session 9. Afterward, Matt followed it with some comments to help explain its rather murky and, to some viewers, confusing ending, which leaves open the distinct possibility of either a supernatural or a purely psychological explanation for the horrific events of the plot. Several audience members thanked him for helping to clarify. Many made a point, both that night and in the following days, of telling him how much they had truly enjoyed the film.

The festival culminated with the 8 p.m. screening of The Exorcist. Matt introduced the film by explaining both its direct origin in the minds and efforts of William Peter Blatty, who wrote the novel and the screenplay, and William Friedkin, who directed the film, and its more metaphorical origin in the “cultural vortex” of the 1970s, when Americans increasingly felt as if their society, and also their very selves, had broken loose from their moorings and entered a terrifying state of drift and decay. He also linked the film to the real-life phenomenon of possession and exorcism, and informed the audience of the increasing prevalence of exorcisms and exorcists in modern-day American and global society, as illustrated most pertinently for Central Texans by last summer’s visit to San Angelo by the exorcist officially assigned the New York Diocese, who was invited by San Angelo’s bishop to speak to area priests about a perceived upsurge in demonic possessions and satanic cult activity in the Lone Star State. Although Matt warned that some scenes in the film would probably elicit laughter — a common occurrence during the past couple of decades, when The Exorcist‘s reputation as “the scariest movie ever made” has preceded it and set an impossibly high bar — in fact there was only laughter at a couple of points. Overall, the film still blazed with power, and a couple of the more notorious scenes elicited not giggles but gasps.

As the night drew to a close, several people expressed their hope that the Dark Mirror will return for a third installment in 2012. A better validation of our efforts would be hard to conceive.

Share
Posted in Film Lineup, The Dark Mirror | Leave a comment

Festival Report, Day One

After months of planning, it’s a pleasure to wake up today and announce that Day One of The Dark Mirror 2011 was as much of a blast as we had all hoped it would be. About 120 people — college students, high school students, MCC faculty and staff, and horror film fans in general — attended the three screenings, and this made for a particularly vocal and responsive audience, especially at the night’s final event.

The 3 p.m. screening of Risen featured openings remarks by Damon Crump, the film’s director, who talked about the ins and outs of making a low-budget zombie movie that doesn’t look that way, and also about what motivated him and David Talbot, who wrote the screenplay, to tackle the project. Before that, there was an informal discussion with some early-arriving audience members about the basic  nature of the zombie as a monster and the various explanations that different filmmakers, staring with George Romero in Night of the Living Dead, have given for its origin. After the screening, Dark Mirror co-chairs Matt Cardin and Jim Kendrick said a few words about the psychological, spiritual, and philosophical meaning of zombies, which channel all kinds of deep human fears about about our animal natures and the fate of our selves or souls. A reporter from KWTX News 10 showed up to cover the event in a segment that aired during the station’s 6 p.m. newscast.

Jim opened the 5:30 screening of Jacob’s Ladder by talking about the film’s origin in the mind of screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin, who also wrote Ghost (which was produced the very same year). He informed the audience that Jacob’s Ladder was a legendary project that bounced around Hollywood for years and garnered a reputation for being one of the most brilliant unproduced screenplays in existence, but it languished in development hell because nobody could figure out how to make it. Rubin, taking direct inspiration from Dante’s Inferno, had written it as a kind of trippy metaphysical parable about a light-and-dark struggle over the title character’s soul, and it wasn’t until director Adrian Lyne, whose previous credits included Flashdance, got hold of the project and collaborated with Rubin to replace the screenplay’s traditional religious symbols and images with more surreal, ambiguous, and psychologically nightmarish ones that it got off the ground. After our showing of it was over, one of the audience members — a budding horror and dark fantasy writer himself — said with some consternation and excitement, “How the hell have I never seen this before!”

Jim also spoke before the 8:00 screening of The Mist, writer-director Frank Darabont’s superlative adaptation of Stephen King’s classic novella about truly horrific monsters arriving in a mysterious mist to menace the residents of a small Maine town. He pointed out that the movie exists as a kind of unofficial companion and counterpoint to another Darabont-King movie, The Shawshank Redemption, since both films (and novellas) are explicitly about hope, and both novellas actually end with that exact. Jim instructed the audience to watch for the way Darabont worked a subtle change on King’s approach to the theme by creating an entirely new and brutal ending for the story. The movie really worked its magic on people last night: the audience reacted vocally throughout, and the shock ending came off as truly shocking, with one audience member exclaiming aloud, “Wait, did he really just do that?” Another told one of the co-creators jokingly, “I don’t like you anymore!” Another said he was overwhelmed.

Many of the attendees said they would return for the final three screenings today. We hope to see them, and also you, there! But we also ask you to remember the advisory that appears on all of the advertising for the film festival (flyers, press release, blog): These films are not intended for young audiences!

 

Share
Posted in The Dark Mirror | Leave a comment

“One of the great sci-fi horrorshows”: Jim Kendrick reviews ‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers 1978′

We’ll launch the second and final day of our 2011 festival tomorrow (Saturday, Oct. 29) with a 3 p.m. screening of director Philip Kaufman’s superlative 1978 take on Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Here’s Dark Mirror co-chair Jim Kendrick’s review of the film.

Over the past decade, at least since the Michael Bay-produced remake of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre(2003), we have been inundated at the multiplex with remakes of horror classics. This is not necessarily a new development, as the horror genre has always thrived on re-envisioning and reworking archetypal scenarios of fear, whether they revolve around reanimating dead bodies or people turning into animals (it is in this sense that horror stories are fundamentally folkloric in nature). Yet, there is something decidedly modern (and blatantly commercial) about the recent spate of remakes, primarily because the films make it hard to escape the sneaking suspicion that they are little more than blunt opportunism to cash in on the ability to sell a new generation on a familiar title. These remakes show little, if any, respect for their forebears or desire to elaborate on them beyond pumping them up with empty style, and as a result they play as little more than jacked up reincarnations of something that was done better several decades earlier.

It would seem that Philip Kaufman’s Invasion of the Body Snatchers, a reworking of Don Siegel’s B-movie classic of the same title from 1956, would be a distinct forerunner of this tendency, but it is actually the antithesis of everything that is currently happening and a template for how to do a horror remake right. Rather than simply exploiting a familiar title, Kaufman’s film takes the basic premise from Siegel’s film (with both films drawing from from Jack Finney’s mid-1950s serialized novel The Body Snatchers) and reimagines it for a different era and a different place, thus making the material entirely new and giving added credence to its deep roots in the fundamental human fear of losing one’s identity. While Siegel’s film played as an paranoid extension of the McCarthy era, suggesting the terrors of small town conformism and the punishment of those who don’t go along with the political status quo, Kaufman’s version (smartly scripted by W.D. Richter, who had previously penned the crime comedy Slither and Peter Bogdanovich’s underappreciated Nickelodeon), satirizes the self-absorbed absurdity of cosmopolitan San Francisco in the Carter years, where self-help gurus, Turkish bath house, and a general air of personal self-indulgence conspire to make it all the more difficult to differentiate humans from pod people.

Kaufman’s film begins on a desolate, dying planet (depicted with fantastically low-budget effects) where gelatinous spores–the seeds that will eventually take over the human race–emerge from a kind of primordial ooze and float into the vacuum of outer space, eventually making their way to Earth, where they attach to various plants, sprout roots, and grow into pretty red flowers that people take home, unaware that they will eventually grow into pods that replicate and then destroy them. The protagonists are two employees of the San Francisco health department: Matthew Bennell (Donald Sutherland) and Elizabeth Driscoll (Brooke Adams). Matthew is a workaholic, intent on uncovering any and all restaurant health violations (at one point in a lab he scrutinizes a baked potato), while Elizabeth is a plant expert who is one of the first to pluck and bring home one of the space flowers. That flower quickly overtakes her boyfriend, a sports-obsessed dentist named Geoffrey (Art Hindle) who can barely take his eyes off the TV and kiss her hello lest he miss a big play. Once he is replicated, however, Geoffrey is all business, a personality change that Elizabeth immediately senses, even if everyone else writes it off, including a famed self-help psychiatrist named Dr. David Kibner (Leonard Nimoy), who sees Elizabeth’s cocern as little more than a subconscious ploy for her to escape from a meaningless relationship (Elizabeth’s largely unacknowledged attraction to Matthew, who is himself curiously unattached, is palpable).

The other primary characters are Jack Bellicec (Jeff Goldblum), a frustrated would-be poet and good friend of Matthew’s, and his wife Nancy (Veronica Cartwright), who runs a Turkish bath where overweight men submerge themselves in mud and steam in the hopes of cleansing something. Like Matthew and Elizabeth, Jack and Nancy provide the film with fully realized characters who genuinely have something to lose to the space pods; unlike so many cardboard horror victims, they have clever, distinct personalities that we might miss. The setting in late-’70s San Francisco gives room for the characters to have an added dimension of eccentricity–some might say kookiness–that defines them (Nancy at one point states her unquestioned belief that the human race is a result of monkeys breeding with spacemen). To lose that is to lose their humanity.

Working with cinematographer Michael Chapman (who shot Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and Raging Bull), Kaufman gives Invasion of the Body Snatchers a great neo-noir feel long before such an approach was trendy and overused. Interiors are shot with blankets of trapezoidal shadows and canted camera angles, and exteriors tend to emphasize a looming sense of danger, even amid the Northern California beauty (in one of the first scenes we briefly glimpse Robert Duvall in an uncredited cameo as a priest on a swing whose menacing blank stare suggests he has become a pod). Without being overbearing, Kaufman makes us feel the tension in the way cosmopolitan anonymity can give way to paranoia and conspiracy (in the DVD commentary, he shares that some of the creepy shots of apparent pod people walking the streets were taken surreptitiously without actors). The filmmakers’ respect for the original film is borne out in both the fidelity to and era-appropriate extension of its underlying fears, but also in funny ways, like the casting of director Don Siegel as a taxi driver and original star Kevin McCarthy as a version of his 1956 character two decades later, still ranting and raving that “They’re already here!”

Much to his chagrin, Siegel was hemmed in by production dictates and forced to frame his paranoid story with a suggestion of hope and victory, which Kaufman is able to jettison, much to the film’s benefit. Kaufman, who would go on to great acclaim in the 1980s for The Right Stuff (1983) and The Unbearable Lightness of Being (1988), is also able to include a lot more humor, which he deploys with malevolent subtlety, but without ever undermining the film’s giddy and overwhelming aura of tension. He also exploits to great effect the then-new developments of Dolby stereo sound (Ben Burtt, who did much of the sound design on Star Wars and later WALL•E, was an important collaborator), which gives the on-screen visuals an added aura of otherworldly grossness. One of the film’s greatest sound effects is “the scream,” a horrifying screech the pod people use to identify residual humans (Abel Ferrara made even better use of it in his criminally underseen 1993 film Body Snatchers). As a result, Invasion of the Body Snatchers is one of the great sci-fi horrorshows, a movie that gooses you with its premise, makes you laugh and jump, and ultimately leaves you with something you can’t quite shake.

Jim Kendrick
Co-Chair, Dark Mirror planning committee

Share
Posted in Reviews | Tagged as: | Leave a comment

Waco Tribune feature: “Dark Mirror fest offers 6 horror films”

There’s a great write-up about us in today’s Waco Tribune! It’s titled “Dark Mirror fest offers 6 horror films,” and the Web version is behind the Trib’s paywall, so we can’t link to it directly. But you can read it on the Web if you’re a subscriber, or in the print edition, which is of course available everywhere in the Waco area. We can tell you that entertainment editor Carl Hoover does a fine job of describing the theme and nature of our 2011 film festival, as seen in these snippets:

The second Dark Mirror Horror Festival moves inside in more than one way this year with a slate of six films screened for free today and Saturday at McLennan Community College’s Lecture Hall. Last year’s debut featured film screenings on consecutive weeks at MCC’s outdoor Bosque River Stage. Turnout was encouraging, but organizers Matt Cardin and James Kendrick opted to move the festival inside this year and cluster film showings to make it easier for filmgoers to attend … The first Dark Mirror festival examined how horror movies reflected the societal fears and concerns of specific decades — the “dark mirror” of the festival’s title — but this year’s version takes a look at more internal, individual fears with the theme “Horror and the Soul” … Friday’s film selections share a common thread of monsters or supernatural beings inhabiting a shadowy, post-death territory … Saturday’s movies examine the loss of a person’s soul or personality to an outside force.”

Thanks, Carl!

Share
Posted in The Dark Mirror | Tagged as: , | Leave a comment